CONSTITUTIONAL RECALL OF

There is no shortage of waste throughout government.  Various social program qualifications have created a welfare dependency culture that has demonized working families who actually need these programs to feed their kids [only while we are fixing the causes of "serf economics"].  University administrators have given themselves bonuses while charging impoverished students and families a fortune to perpetuate the money-laundering credit-tit.  New and remodeled government buildings are popping up in the place of perfectly fine ones all the time.  Subsidies and grants to foundations and international organizations such as the UN and disaster relief funds are embezzled for private gains and expensive banquets on an increasing scale.  We are the primary subsidizer of the UN, only so its principal bodies can undermine and impede any good work that the organization does.  But does anybody seriously believe that a significantly higher percentage of the waste is limited to the abuse of spending on demand-side economics?  Taxpayers are indirectly subsidizing Walmart, Amazon, and other giant wage-employers everyday through food stamps because they refuse to invest enough profit in adequate compensation.  We are also directly subsidizing the biggest international business buddies of everyone’s favorite politicians just for conducting their normal business: examples like subsidized Monsanto corn in Mexico are endless.  We don't need to jeopardize national security with all of these failing wealth redistribution programs in the first place.  Tracking overall supply-side spending abuse is tricky for similar reasons as with demand-side: the volume of dollars in question, the volume of special interest subsidy laws, systematic errors, insider politicking.  Millions of Americans are receiving tens of thousands of dollars in welfare which adds up after years, and tens of thousands of multibillion dollar businesses are receiving trillions as well.  The nature of business economics does not mean that one can suddenly characterize whether “all businesses” are participating in these wealth-redistribution conflicts of interest or are not.  Obviously, many businesses are, many aren’t, and some have even been caught.  Many of the narrow characterizations I’ve heard from both sides of what is and is not wealth redistribution or what a business is or is not doing behind closed doors are simply impossible to make.  When one tries to breakdown federal spending, both parties can make up their own charts when the truth should not be that hard to find, so I don’t need any charts because I already know that the waste in all parts of the chart need to be cut.